Positioning that says nothing
A proposition every competitor could also claim is not a position. If swapping in a rival’s name leaves the sentence true, the market has been given no reason to choose.
03 · Strategic Marketing
Reach, impressions and engagement are inputs. None of them appear in a set of accounts. We start from what a customer is worth and what one costs to acquire, and work backwards to the activity that justifies itself.
01 · The problem
This is rarely anybody’s fault. Marketing is measured in its own vocabulary, finance is measured in another, and no one is asked to reconcile the two, so the annual review becomes a discussion about activity rather than return.
A proposition every competitor could also claim is not a position. If swapping in a rival’s name leaves the sentence true, the market has been given no reason to choose.
Budget follows whatever was discussed most recently rather than where this business’s customers actually decide. The result is presence everywhere and traction nowhere.
Without a defensible cost per acquired customer and a lifetime value to set against it, there is no way to say whether spending more would be growth or waste.
Campaigns launch without a stated hypothesis, a measurement plan or a stopping rule, so underperforming activity continues on momentum rather than evidence.
02 · What you receive
Building demand generation before the proposition is settled is how businesses spend efficiently on the wrong message. The order below is not negotiable, and it is the reason the work holds.
03 · How it runs
What you claim, who you claim it to and what you charge are one decision, not three. Marketing engagements that treat them separately produce a proposition the finance function never agreed to.

Margin, repeat rate and retention by segment. Until this is known, every judgement about acquisition spend is a guess dressed as a decision.
Which buyer, against which alternative, on what claim, tested against what the sales team actually hears rather than what the leadership team hopes.
Channels funded against modelled return, each with a hypothesis and a stopping rule agreed before any money is committed.
Monthly, in the language of the P&L. If marketing cannot be discussed at board level without a translator, it will keep being cut first.
04 · Is this the right service?
Any one of these is worth a conversation. Three or more usually means the problem is positioning rather than execution.
05 · Questions
General questions about fees, timing and how engagements are scoped are answered on the frequently asked questions page.
No. Agencies execute; we set the position, the economics and the governance they execute against. Good agencies generally welcome this, because a clear brief and an agreed measure of success is what they have usually been asking for.
We are not a creative studio and we do not pretend to be. We write the proposition, the architecture and the brief, then work with whoever produces the work, yours or a partner, to keep the output faithful to the strategy.
Then the first version is approximate and clearly labelled as such, which is still far more useful than nothing. We record which assumptions are weak and what would need to be tracked to firm them up, so the model improves as the data does.
Yes, though the shape changes. With long sales cycles and few accounts, the work concentrates on proposition, pricing and the account economics rather than on campaign volume. The underlying question is identical: what a client is worth against what winning one costs.
Honestly: it depends on your sales cycle, and anyone who answers otherwise is guessing. What appears quickly is clarity on where money is currently being wasted, which is often the first measurable effect. Revenue change follows the cycle length of your own market, not our engagement calendar.
06 · Start the conversation
An introductory consultation is a straightforward conversation about your position and your priorities. No charge, no proposal deck, and no obligation to go further.